Vietnam veterans’ reactions to Vietnam War movies have been mixed, but several common themes show up; many Vietnam Veterans appreciate films that felt emotionally truthful; many felt Hollywood relied too much on stereotypes, others wanted a more historical and political context, while some worried about the opposite the glorification of war. Movies about what happened to veterans when we came home also resonated strongly with many Vietnam Veterans. But most Vietnam Veterans were most concerned with what Hollywood did to oversimplify the experiences and trauma and alienation that many of us felt when we returned home.
Personally, I’ve only seen one Vietnam War movie that I really appreciated and that movie was “We Were Soldiers”. I viewed this movie and it’s probably the best portrayal of our military in Vietnam. I want to caveat this by reminding everyone that I was a MACV advisor in Vietnam, and I was not involved with divisional type operations as was seen in this movie. But this movie struck home. It was a realistic display of the training, bravery, valor and dedication of our soldiers there. It demonstrated the superb leadership by General Hal Moore and Command Sergent Major Plumley as well as many of the junior officers and Noncommissioned officers of the unit.
Many of my fellow veterans appreciated the movie “Platoon”. While I was not a fan of the movie it did bring out some of the experiences that many of us had in Vietnam. The movie brought out the concept of fear, the confusion the trauma and the moral conflict involved with what many soldiers experienced in Vietnam. The movie was realistic enough to trigger physical reactions among a lot of Vietnam Veterans in theaters. Many of us once we saw the movie did not want to see it again because it brought back painful memories.
Perhaps my biggest complaint about the movies that came out about Vietnam is that they tended to stereotype those of us who served there. The movies and television often showed Vietnam Veterans as being unstable, violent, dangerous or broken. Hollywood portrayed us as being psychotic and this was extremely inaccurate and harmful to our veterans.
Some of us wanted to see Vietnam in a more historical and less of a political context. We remember the movies that came out during and after World War II; our soldiers were viewed as being heroic, patriotic and dedicated to the cause of freedom. In most of the movies that came out about Vietnam you don’t get that sense of patriotism. What you generally envision is a person, generally a draftee, suffering from PTSD, someone mixed up in drugs or that latent alcoholic. In some cases, such as in the Rambo movies, Vietnam Veterans are seen as being on the near edge of insanity; willing to commit violent acts because of what happened to them in Vietnam.
Overall, many of my fellow Vietnam veterans felt that war movies sometimes helped the public understand their experiences, especially the trauma and alienation they faced when they came home. But they also often felt misrepresented when films reduced them to stereotypes—either as damaged threats or exaggerated heroes—instead of showing them as complex people shaped by a difficult and controversial war.
In short, many veterans wanted films to show them as complex human beings, not as one-dimensional victims, villains, or heroes. The stereotypes veterans objected to were usually not just “negative images,” but simplified roles that made Vietnam veterans seem less human and less varied than they really were.
Perhaps the strongest stereotypes that most Vietnam veterans are opposed to is when Vietnam veterans are shown as mentally unstable, unpredictable, paranoid, or unable to function in ordinary society. This image suggested that our combat experience automatically made us dangerous or damaged. Veterans often found this harmful because it turned real psychological struggles—such as PTSD, survivor’s guilt, depression, or difficulty adjusting—into a dramatic movie device. Instead of showing trauma with care, some films made veterans seem frightening or abnormal.
Another common stereotype is the veteran as the Violent Loner. A man who cannot control his anger and solves problems through violence. He may be shown as isolated, suspicious of society, and ready to explode. This bothers veterans because it connected military service with criminality or violence. While some veterans did struggle after returning home, most were not violent threats. Films that repeated this image made the public fear veterans rather than understand them.
Some movies and television shows portray Vietnam veterans mainly as ruined men, the broken victim, who can never recover. They are shown as permanently traumatized, helpless, addicted, homeless, or emotionally destroyed. We objected because this stereotype removes our strength, resilience, and diversity. Vietnam veterans came home and built families, successful careers, and communities after the war. Even those who suffered deeply did not want to be seen only as victims.
We Vietnam veteran resent television and movies that try to make our efforts represent their views of America’s guilt over the war. The character may exist mainly to show moral damage, shame, or national failure. This can be powerful, but veterans sometimes feel it makes them into political symbols rather than real people. Our personal experiences, motives, friendships, fears, and survival are often overshadowed by the movie’s political message.
The opposite stereotype appears in action films: the veteran becomes an almost unbeatable warrior. He is tougher, more skilled, and more violent than everyone else, often fighting a new war by himself. We tend to dislike this because it glorifies combat and makes Vietnam seem like a stage for heroic fantasy. It also ignores the confusion, fear, boredom, moral conflict, and trauma that we actually experienced. A common saying was that our war was hours of sheer boredom surrounded by seconds of terror.
Movies often show Vietnam veterans as unable to reconnect with family, friends, or American society. They are treated as people who do not belong anywhere. Veterans recognized that alienation was real for many returning soldiers, especially because they often came home to public hostility or indifference. But they objected when films made alienation seem universal or permanent, as if veterans could never rejoin society.
Some films used veterans mainly to support either an antiwar or pro-war message. The veteran might be shown as proof that the war was evil, or as proof that soldiers were betrayed by politicians and civilians. Veterans’ concern was that this flattened their experiences. Different veterans had different views about the war, the military, protest movements, and their own service. Movies sometimes ignored that variety.
The problem wasn’t that movies showed trauma, anger, guilt, or alienation. Those experiences were real for many veterans. The problem was that films often made those traits seem like the whole story. Many Vietnam veterans wanted portrayals that showed them as complicated individuals—people who could be wounded, proud, angry, thoughtful, patriotic, critical, resilient, and conflicted all at once. Vietnam veterans generally want to be portrayed as full, complex human beings, not as stereotypes.
Vietnam veterans did not all have the same experience. Some supported the war; others opposed it. Some struggled deeply after returning home; others adjusted more easily. Some felt pride in their service; others felt anger, regret, confusion, or betrayal. I for one was extremely proud of my service in Vietnam. I was appalled by some of the antiwar protests that were going on while I was serving in Vietnam in a combat role. It was difficult to understand why men would dessert or flee to Canada to avoid their patriotic obligation to serve in the military when called. I stayed in the army and made it a career, and as a result I was fortunate in that I associated with many Vietnam veterans, and we were able to talk about our experiences with one another. But those of us who felt this way about the war were generally ignored by the media, movies and television. Veterans want movies to show this range instead of suggesting there is only one “Vietnam vet” story.
A major part of the Vietnam veteran experience was coming home. We returned to a country divided over the war and we didn’t receive the welcome or support we expected. Veterans want films to show the challenges of reintegration—family tensions, public misunderstanding, lack of medical or psychological support—without making them seem permanently unable to belong.
In short; Vietnam veterans generally want films to show them with honesty and respect: hurt but not helpless, brave but not glorified, flawed but not monstrous, and shaped by war but not completely defined by it. Films can include historical context without turning into a history or political lecture by weaving background into the story, characters, setting, and consequences. For Vietnam War films, that context is especially important because veterans often feel that movies showed trauma or violence without explaining the larger forces that shaped their experiences.
If you are asking which films are usually considered both strong and relatively accurate, the best choices are:
- Platoon — best overall blend of realism, veteran perspective, and artistic quality (not one of my favorites)
- Hamburger Hill — strongest battlefield realism (good)
- We Were Soldiers — accurate battle-based film with a more heroic tone (my favorite)
- Full Metal Jacket — realistic training/dehumanization, more stylized combat section (I personally didn’t like it!)
The movie’s most often considered the worst from a veteran centered or historical accuracy perspective are usually:
- The Green Berets — too propagandistic and simplistic but a patriotic storyline (and what red-blooded American veteran can’t love “The Duke”?)
- Rambo: First Blood Part II — turns Vietnam into action fantasy
- Missing in Action — revenge fantasy and POW-myth focus
- The Deer Hunter — powerful, but criticized for false and racist imagery
- Apocalypse Now — artistically great, but historically surreal and inaccurate
When I look at movies about the Vietnam War, I personally have not seen very many films that I thought were good. Most of the films and TV shows have missed the point of our service in Vietnam. They played to the antiwar sentiment that existed and still exist in many cases without ever really looking deeply into the impact of the war on the soldier himself. I often worry that future generations are going to see these movies on late night TV or on cable and are going to get a poor idea of what we actually experienced in Vietnam. Actually, my favorite Vietnam movie is Robin Williams “Good Morning Vietnam”, it shows the relationship of an American in dealing with the Vietnamese people, some of the Idiotic things that happened in Vietnam. While it didn’t glorify the soldiers in the movie it made them human and painted a realistic picture of what they experienced. While this is not a combat movie it shows a different side of Vietnam.
As a Vietnam adviser working directly with the Vietnamese people, I’ve yet to see any movies that talk about our part of the war. Ours was a different part, that’s one of the reasons that I wrote “The Advisor Series” to tell some of those stories in a fictional way.
If you’re enjoying these blogs, please drop me a comment or if you have any questions that I might answer, submit a comment on the comment pages. I’m always glad to hear from you.
Again, please look at all my books that I have listed. They can be reviewed and/or purchased from Amazon.com with the click of a button directly from my website at Authors Published Works.
The Advisor Series:
- “The Senior Army Instructor; The Paul Tyler Saga Begins” (https://www.amazon.com/dp/BOGSXJ2ZHC)
- “The Advisor, Kien Bing, South Vietnam, 1969-1970. A Novel” (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09L4X5NQ3)
- “The Province Senior Intelligence Advisor, Kien Song Province 1970-1971; A Novel” (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BHL2XCX5)
- “The Hardchargers,” Vietnam 1972-1973; A Novel” (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C7SPR1JY)
- “The Tuscarora Trail” (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0D3QY2GM6)
Civil War History/Fiction:
- “A Civil War History of Harrison County West Virginia 1861-1865” (https://www.amazon.com/dp/ B0B1CLL28Q
- “The Most Hated Man in Clarksburg” (https://www.amazon.com/dp/ B0C6429M1X
Science Fiction: (Chuck Neighbors author, Taylor editor/coauthor)
| “Destiny” https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B6WGWHLS |
| “HomeFall” https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CJN1JLWF |
| “The Planet’s Revenge” https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CYQBHC6C |
Leave a Reply